Sunday, November 11, 2012

Making a case for quality has always been one of biggest challenge for any quality professional, even before he/she can start a company-wide quality improvement project. Are there ways to gain traction?



1. Consider/Look for regulatory compliance arguments: Compliance to national, local statutory laws are mandatory for businesses, especially in regulated businesses like pharmaceuticals and medical devices. Avoiding warning letters, recalls and consent decrees make compelling reasons for quality improvement.

2. Understand and promote Cost of Quality: The cost of preventing and mitigating poor quality is estimated at 33% of the cost of addressing problems that brought along by poor quality. With the rising figures of legal compensation payments, cost to rework and scrap, COQ also makes good argument.

3. Divide and Conquer : fostering a quality-oriented business ethics takes lots of solicitation and negotiation. Its not always easy to hit up the management at the very early stage; start with a department that is receptive and in need of improvement. Achieve small wins and promote the success by words-of-mouth.

Saturday, November 3, 2012

Thinking about  building an effective team in office? Think military!


  1. Visualize an "ideal" team with a tactical objective, as well as strategic departmental goals. 
  2. Establish individual responsibility and corresponding baseline competency based on the tactical objective. Rigorous development plan. Team member understand his/her role and importance in the team.
  3. Embed team-building activity into daily work routines, but not only for special occasions : "free" team lunches to favorite restaurants, coffee breaks, engage in occasional pranks and jokes.
  4. Expose the team to contingencies and crises. Foster individual leadership.  Enhance team adaptability to unusual work environments.
  5. Win small "battles". Celebrate individual and team achievements to build sense of belonging and Elitism.

Monday, June 11, 2012

For those of you operating in Brazilian Medical device market, do not overlook the device vigilance requirements in Resolution - RDC No. 67 of 21 December 2009 .


The following matrix summarizes the critical reporting scenario and associated regulatory time constraints.


Saturday, May 26, 2012



So you have been practicing 100meter sprint for some time now, in preparation for the big time. But how do you fare against other competitors? You won't unless you put someone next to you on the starting line.


Have you implemented Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)  for your organization? KPI can be considered as a big chunk of the Six Sigma Measure phase, as well as forming the boundary conditions for the Control phase.


Realistic, purposeful KPIs will tell you the following critical health parameters of your business
  1. Efficiency
  2. Quality
  3. Customer Satisfaction

Data collected for KPI will also enable management to benchmark own performance against competitors and industry standard. 


So think competitive; set goals against others and measure KPI honestly.

Saturday, May 19, 2012

To Quality or not , that is the question? 
Implementation of a Quality system is often looked upon by smaller businesses as cumbersome, ceremonial process that is non-value adding. Is this really the case?




Consider the following benefits that a well managed Quality program can bring to your business:

  1. Lower operating cost, improving margin by reducing production waste (Lean, cost of quality)
  2. Certification to ISO standard, or compliance with ISO standard to meet customer expectations
  3. Competitiveness, innovation and value of the product
  4. Effective Quality Management System that is required and complies with regulatory environment 
Summary of recent warning letters and some fairly amusing inspectional findings.

Warning Letter Analysis: FDA Warning Letters Cite Companies for Marketing, cGMP, Design Deficiencies RAPS News - Article View



Tuesday, May 8, 2012

It is absolutely essential to establish a robust and effective complaint handling systems for device-related reportable events in compliance with 21 CFR 803. However, the trending of such reportable device complaints is also explicitly required under 21 CFR 820.100, and often overlooked by Regulatory compliance professionals.


Sec. 820.100 Corrective and preventive action



(a) Each manufacturer shall establish and maintain procedures for implementing corrective and preventive action. The procedures shall include requirements for:
(1) Analyzing processes, work operations, concessions, quality audit reports, quality records, service records, complaints, returned product, and other sources of quality data to identify existing and potential causes of nonconforming product, or other quality problems. Appropriate statistical methodology shall be employed where necessary to detect recurring quality problems;

Establishing a statistical method to analyze/trend device complaints and other key Quality indicator will be instrumental in maintaining Quality Management of the product, as well as compliance with regulatory requirements.